I keep going around and
around about who is the greater evil and I keep landing on the Democrats. I
know, it’s not an obvious choice, but anyone willing to look at things honestly
has to at least consider the idea.
Consider for example,
Trump’s willingness to attack the U.S. Postal System. It seems utterly evil and
stupid. And it is, though the extent of it or the veracity of it I admit I have
yet to determine. That made me swing towards considering him the greater threat.
But as I was considering this I was doing a YouTube search and was becoming
frustrated with my inability to find the exact clip I wanted. Search engines
used to be so much easier to use.
Then it occurred to me how
manipulated search engines have become as a result of the cries to enforce
censorship coming from the Democrats under the guise of Russian interference. I
was typing in “Russian bounty Nikko House” and all I was coming up with were
videos from major corporate news outlets covering the Russian bounty story. It
was not until I rearranged the words that I was able to find the Nikko House
clip I wanted.
The point is, if you
weren’t specifically looking for the clip, you never would have stumbled upon
it. All you would ever see is what major corporate media permits you to see,
and their take is vastly different from non-sanctioned perspectives. If you do
not simply accept one of the two accepted positions on any given issue
(Republican or Democrat), you will find it difficult to find alternative voices.
And if you have a different take on any given issue, you will find it extremely
difficult for your voice to be heard. If you speak out against war or imperialism,
it will be harder still. And if you are critical of Israel in any way, expect to
be marginalized more than if you were promoting violence and hate.
Censorship at this
moment is very real and it is getting worse. And the blame for that can be
placed clearly in the lap of the Democrats. I hear no one on the Right calling
for clamping down on non-sanctioned voices.
“But,” Democrats say, “the
right to vote is being impeded by Trump’s attacks on the Post Office, which is one
of the most sacred foundations of our Democracy.” To which I agree, both in regards
to the wrongness and the degree of harm inflicted by Trump’s behavior. Trump is
very bad, Trump is very wrong.
But of the two, the
attack against our first amendment rights is at least on par with what Trump is
doing. And nobody in the liberal left is saying anything about it, and if they
do they are actively encouraging it. Russian interference is the pretext.
Silencing dissent against U.S. foreign policy is the reality.
Which would make it a
toss-up, each side being approximately as harmful to our country, Trump
threatening our democratic elections, Democrats threatening free speech.
Except the Democratic
Party has been making a travesty of our elections as well. Well before the
first primary votes were cast, there was a full court press to delegitimize the
progressive wing of the party. Vacuous candidates like Beto O’Rourke were given
nothing but positive press while Tulsi Gabbard and Bernie Sanders were smeared
when they were not simply ignored. When Gabbard’s debate performance prompted
voters to make her the most Googled candidate, Google suppressed her ads.
And then there was the
cancellation of the Iowa polls before the Iowa Caucus. Followed by an even more
bewildering inability to actually determine a winner. Followed by further
problems actually tabulating votes in other states. Followed by changing the
rules determining who would be in the debate after Tulsi qualified for the
debate. Followed by more shenanigans than I can now remember, but culminating
in an orchestrated maneuver to have all remaining centrists suspend their
campaigns while Elizabeth Warren stayed in to syphon off progressive votes from
Sanders. Oh, and let us not forget the ridiculously long lines voters had to
wait in while polling stations were being closed in the midst of a pandemic.
So the Democrats are at
least complicit in voter suppression and keeping any meaningful change from
taking place. They are more actively involved in internet censorship. In four
years, they have done nothing to oppose Trump in what I most care about. They’ve
applauded Trump when he’s been most militarily aggressive and gone to his right
to attack him when he’s failed to warmonger sufficiently. In most issues that
matter to me, Democrats have either mirrored Trump, supported Trump, or else
been to the Right of Trump.
There is one last
matter to consider. Trump is an individual, whereas the Democratic Party is an
establishment. The Trump movement is a cult of personality doomed to
disintegrate the moment the man either becomes too old or falls from favor due
to his own incompetency. The Democratic Party has the potential to remain a
problem indefinitely. Not tied to one individual, it is capable of shedding its
failures with a given candidate and using another empty vessel to promote the
agenda of a powerful elite. So even if Trump were Hitler, I don’t view him as
being as dangerous as an undemocratic power that uses secrecy and censorship to
push the agenda of the military industrial complex. If comparisons of Trump to
Hitler can be made, then comparing the Democratic Party and the forces it
protects to The Gestapo, or at least Joseph Goebbels, is not beyond the pale.
So if forced to choose,
there is a very real case to be made that Trump is the lesser of two evils,
though granted he is the more odious of two presidential candidates.
But this is of course a
foolish discussion to have. When given two absolutely unacceptable options, the
only logical response is to insist upon a third one. When a system gives you no
way to change the system, it’s time to stop playing by the rules the system has
laid down. And the system will not bring about the kind of change we require.
It will never give you the tools you need to change things. The system will not
give you the option of changing the system.
You ask me what the
alternatives are. It doesn’t matter what suggestions I give you, you will not accept
them until you are willing to admit the two options you are given are insufficient.
For now, I can only tell you that I am not buying either one of them. I’m sorry
this does not fit into the paradigm you’ve been led to accept. But smashing
that paradigm is going to be necessary if we are ever to achieve the meaningful
change we need.
Like my writing? Please follow me on Twitter or Facebook, sign up for my newsletter, or check me out on Amazon.